Methodology 7 min read

Calculating Present Value of Wrongful‑Death Pecuniary Damages: Support, Services, and Funeral Expenses

A step-by-step framework for valuing wrongful death economic losses including loss of financial support, household services, and funeral expenses using present value methodologies.

By Christopher T. Skerritt, CRC, MBA

Introduction

Wrongful‑death actions often seek pecuniary damages—the economic losses suffered by survivors due to the untimely death of a wage‑earner. Such damages typically include:

  1. Loss of financial support (the decedent's net contributions to household income)
  2. Loss of household services (domestic tasks the decedent would have performed)
  3. Funeral and burial expenses

Converting these future and immediate losses into a single lump‑sum award demands rigorous present‑value (PV) calculations, grounded in reliable data and transparent assumptions. This article outlines a step‑by‑step framework for valuing each component, with APA 7 citations and Month Day, Year date formatting.

1. Loss of Financial Support

1.1 Defining Net Support

"Net support" equals the decedent's projected gross earnings minus the portion they would have consumed personally. The remainder represents funds that would have been available to dependents (spouse, children).

$$\text{Net Support}_t = E_t - C$$

Data Sources

1.2 Projecting Support Over Time

Assume real wage growth $g$ (e.g., 2 percent) and project:

$$E_t = E_1 \times (1+g)^{\,t-1},\quad C_t = C \times (1+g_C)^{\,t-1}$$

Often $g_C$ (consumption growth) is set equal to $g$ for simplicity.

1.3 Discounting to Present Value

Using a risk‑free nominal discount rate $r$ (e.g., 3.40 percent, 30‑year Treasury yield) (Bureau of Economic Analysis), the PV of lost support is:

$$\mathrm{PV}_{\text{support}} = \sum_{t=1}^{T} \frac{\bigl(E_t - C_t\bigr)}{(1 + r)^t}$$

where $T$ is the dependency horizon—often the decedent's life expectancy or statutory retirement age, adjusted for survival and labor‑force participation (Saurman & Means, 1989).

2. Loss of Household Services

Household services include chores (cleaning, cooking), childcare, and maintenance. Section 7 provides the detailed replacement‑cost approach; here we summarize:

  1. Estimate annual hours lost (e.g., 14.07 hours/week × 52 weeks = 732 hours) using the ATUS (BLS, 2025).
  2. Select replacement‑cost rate—e.g., $20.83/hour (maid's OEWS mean $16.66 plus 25 percent overhead) (nfda.org).
  3. Compute annual service value: Hours × Rate (e.g., 732 × $20.83 ≈ $15,255).
  4. Project growth (medical CPI or general CPI) and discount similarly to support:
$$\mathrm{PV}_{\text{services}} = \sum_{t=1}^{T} \frac{S_t}{(1 + r)^t}$$

where $S_t$ is the replacement‑cost value in year $t$.

3. Funeral and Burial Expenses

3.1 Current Median Cost

According to the National Funeral Directors Association, the median cost for a funeral with viewing and burial in 2023 was $8,300 (nfda.org).

3.2 Timing and Discounting

Funeral costs are typically incurred immediately post‑death. If the award is made $t_f$ years after the loss, discount:

$$\mathrm{PV}_{\text{funeral}} = \frac{\$8{,}300}{(1 + r)^{\,t_f}}$$

Often $t_f$ is assumed small (e.g., ≤ 0.1 year), making discount negligible.

4. Case Study Example

Facts:

  1. Year 1 net support: $80{,}000 - 58{,}273 = \$21{,}727$.
  2. PV of support:
    $$\mathrm{PV}_{\text{support}} \approx \sum_{t=1}^{20}\frac{21{,}727\times1.02^{\,t-1}}{1.034^t} \approx \$310{,}000$$
  3. PV of services:
    $$\mathrm{PV}_{\text{services}} \approx \sum_{t=1}^{20}\frac{15{,}255\times1.02^{\,t-1}}{1.034^t} \approx \$217{,}000$$
  4. PV of funeral (assume $t_f=0.1$):
    $$\mathrm{PV}_{\text{funeral}} = \frac{8{,}300}{1.034^{0.1}} \approx \$8{,}270$$
  5. Total PV:
    $$\$310{,}000 + \$217{,}000 + \$8{,}270 = \$535{,}270$$

5. Potential Considerations

6. Common Approaches

  1. Document data sources—BLS OEWS, BEA PCE, ATUS, NFDA, Treasury yields.
  2. Perform sensitivity analysis—vary $g$, $r$, and service rates by ±1 percent.
  3. Apply survival weights—attenuate support and services by SSA survival probabilities for each $t$.
  4. Peer review—consider having a second economist verify assumptions and calculations.

References

About the Author

Christopher T. Skerritt, CRC, MBA is a forensic economist and certified rehabilitation counselor with over 20 years of experience in economic damage analysis. He provides expert testimony in personal injury, wrongful death, and employment litigation matters throughout New England.

Contact: (203) 605-2814 | chris@skerritteconomics.com

Need Expert Economic Analysis?

Get professional forensic economics support for your case

Schedule Consultation

Or call directly: (203) 605-2814