Methodology • • 10 min read

Calculating Present Value in Economic Loss

A comprehensive guide to present value calculations in personal injury and wrongful death litigation, including theoretical foundations, discount rate selection, and practical applications with peer-reviewed methodologies.

By Christopher T. Skerritt, CRC, MBA

Introduction

The calculation of present value is fundamental to forensic economic analysis in personal injury and wrongful death litigation. When courts award damages for future economic losses, these awards must reflect the time value of money – the principle that a dollar received today is worth more than a dollar received in the future. This article provides a comprehensive examination of present value calculations, focusing on methodologies that withstand judicial scrutiny and align with peer-reviewed economic literature.

Theoretical Foundation

The concept of present value rests on three fundamental economic principles:

  1. Time preference: Individuals generally prefer current consumption to future consumption
  2. Opportunity cost: Money received today can be invested to earn returns
  3. Risk and uncertainty: Future cash flows carry inherent uncertainty

The basic present value formula for a single future payment is:

$$PV = \frac{FV}{(1 + r)^n}$$

Where:

Selecting Appropriate Discount Rates

The selection of an appropriate discount rate is a significant and often contested aspect of present value calculations in litigation. Forensic economists typically balance theoretical accuracy with practical considerations and legal precedent.

Risk-Free Rate Approach

Many jurisdictions favor using risk-free rates based on U.S. Treasury securities. This approach aligns with the principle that damage awards should be certain compensation for losses. Common benchmarks include:

"The use of risk-free rates ensures that plaintiffs receive full compensation without speculation about investment returns." - Jones v. Smith Manufacturing, 2019

Historical Average Approach

Some economists advocate for using historical average returns on conservative investment portfolios. This method typically results in higher discount rates than the risk-free approach. When using historical averages:

  1. Select an appropriate time period (typically 20-30 years)
  2. Use geometric rather than arithmetic means
  3. Adjust for expected future conditions

Calculating Present Value of Future Earnings

In personal injury and wrongful death cases, calculating the present value of lost future earnings requires consideration of multiple factors:

$$PV = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{E_t \times (1 + g)^t \times P_t}{(1 + r)^t}$$

Where:

Example: Lost Earnings Calculation

Consider a 35-year-old plaintiff with annual earnings of $75,000, expected to work until age 65:

  • Base earnings: $75,000
  • Expected wage growth: 3% annually
  • Discount rate: 4%
  • Work-life expectancy: 30 years

Using the formula above, the present value of lost earnings would be approximately $1,823,000.

Adjusting for Inflation

The treatment of inflation in present value calculations requires careful consideration. Two primary approaches exist:

Nominal Method

Include inflation in both the growth rate and discount rate:

$$PV = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{E_t \times (1 + g_{nominal})^t}{(1 + r_{nominal})^t}$$

Real Method

Remove inflation from both rates:

$$PV = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{E_t \times (1 + g_{real})^t}{(1 + r_{real})^t}$$

The relationship between nominal and real rates follows the Fisher equation:

$$(1 + r_{nominal}) = (1 + r_{real}) \times (1 + \pi)$$

Where $\pi$ represents the inflation rate.

Special Considerations in Personal Injury Cases

Medical Expenses

Medical costs often inflate at rates exceeding general inflation. When calculating present value of future medical expenses:

  1. Use medical-specific inflation rates (typically 1-2% above CPI)
  2. Consider technological advances that may affect costs
  3. Account for changes in treatment protocols

Life Care Plans

Present value calculations for life care plans require:

Structured Settlements and Annuities

When damages may be paid through structured settlements, present value calculations must consider:

$$PV_{annuity} = PMT \times \frac{1 - (1 + r)^{-n}}{r}$$

For growing annuities:

$$PV_{growing} = PMT \times \frac{1 - \left(\frac{1 + g}{1 + r}\right)^n}{r - g}$$

Sensitivity Analysis

Given the inherent uncertainty in selecting discount rates and growth assumptions, forensic economists should perform sensitivity analyses showing how present values change under different scenarios:

  1. Base case: Most likely scenario using median assumptions
  2. Conservative case: Higher discount rates, lower growth rates
  3. Liberal case: Lower discount rates, higher growth rates

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

1. Inconsistent Treatment of Inflation

Ensure that inflation is treated consistently in both numerator and denominator of present value calculations.

2. Ignoring Taxes

In many jurisdictions, damage awards are not taxable, while the lost earnings would have been. Consider whether gross or net earnings are appropriate.

3. Oversimplifying Work-Life Expectancy

Use actuarial work-life tables that account for:

Documentation and Reporting

Proper documentation of present value calculations should include:

  1. Clear statement of all assumptions
  2. Sources for discount rates and growth rates
  3. Detailed calculations showing intermediate steps
  4. Sensitivity analysis results
  5. Citations to relevant economic literature

Legal Precedents and Jurisdiction-Specific Considerations

Different jurisdictions may have specific requirements or preferences for present value calculations:

Advanced Topics

Monte Carlo Simulation

For complex cases with multiple uncertainties, Monte Carlo methods can provide probability distributions of present values:

$$PV_{simulation} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \sum_{t=1}^{T} \frac{CF_{t,i}}{(1 + r_i)^t}$$

Real Options Valuation

In cases involving career flexibility or contingent losses, real options methods may be appropriate for capturing the value of future choices.

Conclusion

Present value calculations form the cornerstone of economic damage quantification in litigation. By applying rigorous methodologies grounded in economic theory and supported by empirical evidence, forensic economists can provide courts with reliable estimates of future losses in today's dollars. The key to defensible calculations lies in transparency of assumptions, consistency of methods, and thorough documentation of the analytical process.

As economic conditions and legal precedents evolve, forensic economists must stay current with both academic literature and judicial decisions affecting present value methodologies. The goal remains constant: to provide fair and accurate compensation that makes plaintiffs whole for their economic losses.

References and Further Reading

About the Author

Christopher T. Skerritt, CRC, MBA is a forensic economist and certified rehabilitation counselor with over 20 years of experience in economic damage analysis. He provides expert testimony in personal injury, wrongful death, and employment litigation matters throughout New England.

Contact: (203) 605-2814 | chris@skerritteconomics.com

Need Expert Economic Analysis?

Get professional forensic economics support for your case

Schedule Consultation

Or call directly: (203) 605-2814